|
Post by Anti - Fan on May 17, 2010 11:45:46 GMT -8
and was Howe sound ( Malones) Man of the Match
|
|
|
Post by snoopdog on May 19, 2010 7:24:52 GMT -8
From Park du Griffin......Howe Sound 4, NAFC 3.
This is one of those times when you would really like to take the piss out of someone. Someone who is just annoying. Always time wasting. Always yattering non-sensical. If you have played NAFC, you know who I'm talking about.
This person caused all 4 goals. All 4. Today, yes, I believe in karma.
At one point, Howe Sound was up 3 - 0. Yes, Sushi, agreed, against the play. 3 -1 at the half. Then 3-2, then 4-2 and then the final score.
We've been on the end of many games like this, and yes, we stole 3 points. NAFC dominated most of the second half, and were, on the night, stronger.
Difference: Our keeper made saves. NAFC's keeper...........hmmmmm, not so much.
|
|
Long
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by Long on May 23, 2010 21:09:50 GMT -8
Stats, Stats, we need stats, OK it's an addition. Can we get them posted every Friday or Saturday ?
|
|
|
Post by nscl on May 25, 2010 7:27:57 GMT -8
I post them every Friday, providing I have the scores.
This week I was out of town so I didn't get to it until Monday night.
|
|
|
Post by snoopdog on May 25, 2010 7:33:55 GMT -8
Out of town on a long weekend? .......Christ NSCL, where are your priorities?
Really, ....who can't wait to see the Warriors in first place.......
|
|
|
Post by cside17 on May 26, 2010 19:04:20 GMT -8
Just not good enough for a volunteer. :} How dare you neglect the most important info, this side of the world cup!
|
|
|
Post by Sir M on May 26, 2010 20:39:54 GMT -8
I have not in recent memory seen a team like the Azteca team we played last night. They must have called the poor ref the C word or a bitch 20 or 30 times in Spanish, poor fellow...all for 60 bucks on his part. When we had a PK, (one of probably 4 or 5 that should have been given by the poor intimidated man in the middle), one of these little balding dark haired guys sprints at our player, entering the box at full speed, as if to blindside him as he was taking the PK and then just veers off as he buries it. I don't think the WV player saw it thankfully. They had one guy sent off, it probably should have been several more...and the ref did his best to control them with yellows when he could. His quote to me..." I try to control them, I give them yellows but they don't listen and just attack me". Poor guy.
If the NSCL got Rene to ref a game or two involving that side, I think this kind of thing would stop. Because it is way over the top with that team. It is one thing to be a shite side, but to carry on like that is not respectful to the ref and the game itself.
Sir M
|
|
|
Post by biggerballs on May 26, 2010 23:20:12 GMT -8
Requesting clarification on the advantage rule: (next 2 paragraphs were plucked off the net)
A clause in the soccer rules that gives the Referee the discretion to allow play to continue even after a foul has been committed if stopping play would unfairly punish the fouled team (e.g., if the fouled team had a breakaway & might score even after having been fouled). The idea is that the team which committed the foul should not gain an advantage as a result of the foul. (See "Fouls").
Advantage Clause. This rule states that the Referee, in his discretion, may decide to not stop play due to a foul if it would be to the advantage to the fouled team to not stop play (i.e., The concept is that the team that was fouled should not be punished by having an attack stopped which might result in a goal and, conversely, that the team which committed the foul should not gain an advantage as a result of the foul). (See "Advantage Clause").
This relates to a horribly bad substitute ref of the WV LV game.
issue: defender handles the attacking ball on the 30yardline, attacking winger picks up the ball dribbles to endline (3-4 sec) makes a cross (2-3 sec) that crosses endzone. at least 5-8 sec used up. ref blows whistle, points back to 30 yardline, says hand ball, free kick. WHAT? ref says he has the right to rule an advantage wasn't achieved and that he has 3 seconds (then he says up to 5 secs) to rule an advantage was obtained or to go back to the foul. unbelievable. I appreciate that rule in rugby (it's used all the time) But in soccer refs usually let attacking play continue during a goal scoring opportunity. If the attack fails the ref usually says he played advantage. Interested in your thoughts and knowledge of the rules.
Yes this ref was the worst seen in years. thankfully he was a fill-in because he is only good for fill below an outhouse. The guy worshipped WV gave them all the breaks. Kept chatting to WV players like an annoying geek at a new school. I think WV let him launder their shorts and socks.
Even with all this help WV had a hard time breaking through. LV got the first goal, disecting the flat, over confident back line. their goal was okay burning the midfielder and ran unchallenged to the 30 hit a shot deflecting off the goalies hand an in. LV had 3-4 other missed chances. One guy burned thru WV defence, was pushed and pulled by 2 defenders inside the box and finally hit the post (no advantage penalty call on this one)
A harsh penalty was ruled against LV inside the box on the 70th minute ending the tie. reduced to 10 men with a red and 2 injuries slowed the LV counter.
WV can be shut down with tight marking, a good ref and some luck. Send your players to the gym a few weeks before the game. You have to be 200lbs and fast to play on this team
Vikings really picked up their game disecting the warriors while battling a headwind.
Let the beautiful games begin. I am predicting a record amount of cards during this WC. The Africans will go savage with cleats and teeth.
|
|
|
Post by biggerballs on May 27, 2010 0:05:54 GMT -8
FIFA Rules:
66 Advantage The referee may play advantage whenever an infringement or offence occurs. The referee should consider the following circumstances in deciding whether to apply the advantage or stop play: • the severity of the offence: if the infringement warrants an expulsion, the referee must stop play and send off the player unless there is a subsequent opportunity to score a goal • the position where the offence was committed: the closer to the opponent’s goal, the more effective it can be • the chances of an immediate, promising attack • the atmosphere of the match The decision to penalise the original offence must be taken within a few seconds. If the offence warrants a caution, it must be issued at the next stoppage. However, unless there is a clear advantage, it is recommended that the referee stops play and cautions the player immediately. If the caution is NOT issued at the next stoppage, it cannot be shown later.
Re: seniorM That arrogant ref in question continuously set himself up for abuse. In fact he let the atmosphere of the game disintegrate in a violent and dangerour direction. When WV players acted and talked like Junior B hockey players eg.(WV defender verbally threatens a player half his body weight, in front of the ref, with bodily harm and using the F word 3 or 4 times) and the ref laughs and gives the LV player a yellow (for a reckless but not harmfull challenge). The goof ref lost total control and respect of the players. He let the play escalate to dangerous levels and made continuous bad calls. I am sure our reg refs would have booked a few more WV players for threats of violence.
I think those latino words in question are quite common in regular conversation.
|
|
|
Post by cranky on May 27, 2010 9:13:13 GMT -8
Although it is the referee's responsibility to keep control of the game and ensure that fouls are called appropriately it is also up the player and/or team to control themselves as well.
You can't use the fact that the referee lost control of the game as an excuse to lose control as a player. We've all played long enough to know what is acceptable on the field and there is absolutely no excuse for swearing at the ref, each other, or engaging in dangerous play.
|
|
|
Post by nscl on May 27, 2010 9:37:17 GMT -8
Cside & Snoopy,
I'm ashamed. I really wanted to postpone my holiday so that I could post the scores but my wife wouldn't let me.
I promise to do better in future.
What I can't figure out is why Long was so desperate to see his team listed 5th??!!??
|
|
|
Post by Sir M on May 27, 2010 16:16:17 GMT -8
I don't think the ref lost control. LV is a team out of control, that uses dirty play to make up for its lack of skill, ability, and knowledge of the rules. Plus to say they had several good chances is well,, delusional.
Sir M
|
|
|
Post by whitehart on May 27, 2010 19:23:22 GMT -8
That's classic BiggerBalls..... You actually spent sometime researching the Laws of the game, maybe you could share(with the help of a translator) this with some of your teammates. Perhaps hand out a few leaflets before next game..... we all might benefit from it.
Here's one for ya... " Red Card Offense " - • denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity by deliberately handling the ball (this does not apply to a goalkeeper within his own penalty area)..... That was what the Referee (poor guy) called back on you for a deliberate hand ball.... Let's get back to the real world eh ?
As for the rest of your credibility ShrinkingBalls, Azteca are the same every year, Cheap shot, cowardly, dirty play.... cos you're not good enough to win playing Football.
You remind me of that team from a few years back ' Persian Pink ', they were trying to get in this league but failed miserably as most of their exhibition games ended up abandoned as they seem to lose concept when they figured out they couldn't win.
Why don't you see if they fancy a game, that would be a cracker !
I
|
|
|
Post by Sir M on May 27, 2010 20:33:58 GMT -8
Whitehart, what are you spouting off about? Have you ever won any silverware, either your team or personally, in this league, or in others?
Sir M
|
|
|
Post by norvanman on May 28, 2010 7:11:25 GMT -8
Norvan 5 Seymour 0
|
|